
For reasons which remain mysterious, Amsterdam was the first city in Europe covered by Foursquare. The locals weren't backward in adopting it and pitched battles broke out all over the city over who was mayor of the scone shelf of De BakkersWinkel or boss of codiments in De Burgermeester. I'll be frank; I don't get it. I have a long history of not getting various apps, Twitter being one notable example, but normally that is before I actually use them. Foursquare I have tried. If you are out and about a lot (effectively this means students and the self-employed), the appeal of being informed about where your friends are in a small city like Amsterdam is obvious. For a start you can probably cycle there in less than 10 minutes. It could be even more useful to avoid people you don't want to see: ex-boyfriends, bosses, blood relations. How many social calamities could be avoided that way?
The part that puzzles me is the competition to be mayor. So far being the mayor of anywhere outside your own house has benefits which are at best nugatory, and yet checking in seems to be the first thing that people do when they arrive somewhere. Like smokers who have a cigarette first thing in the morning. This is like sending tweets about what a great time you are having instead of having too good a time to report on it. Unlike other games, there is no prize and no skill is involved. You just have to turn up a lot. If you do become the mayor of a particular venue what exactly does that say about you? That you have no home to go to? Please explain. Answers on a postcard....